![]() When I did some digging, it looks like Waterfox uses Firefox's service at for detecting captive portals (if they exist on a connected Wi-Fi network.) However, it does look like Waterfox did perform a DNS query for and : ![]() But it seems everything runs off CDNs and to a slightly lesser extent, AWS, these days. Just to note, it did connect to a number of different CDNs, and also AWS. When I let Waterfox idle for a few minutes on the standard homepage, it didn't do anything overtly suspicious, according to Sysmon. What's also important is that Waterfox doesn't appear to collect its own telemetry either. (Firefox is on the left, Waterfox on the right) mostly true.įor starters, Waterfox has the Firefox Data Collection and Use removed from the Privacy & Security section of the options menu: One thing that Waterfox boasts is that it's stripped of the telemetry Mozilla puts into Firefox's source code.įrom what I could find, that appears to be. If you don't understand the importance of blocking trackers - not just ads - then learn more about the importance of tracker blocking here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |